WILD RAPS NEUTRALITY ACT IN RADIO ADDRESS
Asserts That Government Must Spurn Protection of Foreign Trade, Travel to Maintain Peace
Arguing that the Neutrality Act passed by Congress last Friday is not sufficient to keep the United States out of a possible world conflict, Payson S. Wild, assistant professor of Government, spoke on "American Neutrality" last night over station WAAB, in the series of Wednesday evening broadcasts sponsored by the Harvard "Guardian", undergraduate magazine of the social sciences.
Professor Wild, speaking over the Colonial network, criticized sharply the new legislation as a peace-maintaining factor. Weighing the efforts of Congress to keep this country out of war, he said: "A simple reiteration of the legal fact that Americans travel and trade in wartime at their own risk that the government will not give them blanket protection in whatever they undertake, and the direction of energy into prevention of war now instead of this naive effort to keep us unentangled by a hodge-podge of embargoes and prohibitions these steps would be far more effective."
Next Wednesday, the Guardian will present J. Raymond Walsh, instructor in Economics, who will talk at the same time over the same station on "Labor's Rid for Power."
Read more in NewsLOWELL HOUSE EXHIBITS "CHRONICLE" OF 1932-33
H.S.U. Sponsors Debates on Points Of Neutrality ActTwo separate plans for determining means to keep America out of war will be initiated this week when Dunster House
Guardian Announced Ten as Members of Business BoardNewly elected members of the Harvard Guardian Business Board were announced yesterday by Jack D. Andrews '39. Business Manager. They
Wild Talks on NeutralityPayson S. Wild, instructor in Government, will broadcast on "American Neutrality" over station WAAB at 9 o'clock tonight.
Langer On AirWilliam L. Langer, Coolidge Professor of History, will continue the present series of radio talks over Station WAAB and the
Wild Strikes at Panama Registry As Morally Unfair"Placing American ships under the flag of Panama is perfectly legal, but immoral, unethical, and unfair. It renders laughable our