News

Harvard Alumni Email Forwarding Services to Remain Unchanged Despite Student Protest

News

Democracy Center to Close, Leaving Progressive Cambridge Groups Scrambling

News

Harvard Student Government Approves PSC Petition for Referendum on Israel Divestment

News

Cambridge City Manager Yi-An Huang ’05 Elected Co-Chair of Metropolitan Mayors Coalition

News

Cambridge Residents Slam Council Proposal to Delay Bike Lane Construction

A Perverted Process

LAST WEEK'S REFERENDUM

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

RESULTS of last week's referendum, in which a Harvard undergraduates voted to install a new student are tainted by perverse procedural rules and voting practices. The Faculty, which must re- constitution before it goes into effect, should invalidity and call for a new one. Otherwise, the Undergraduate Council will get underway next fall under a cloud of an illegitimacy born not of student opposition fundamentally anti-democratic electoral process.

of a 50 percent turnout clause inserted by the Faculty the "no" ballots cast last week by more than a voters actually secured the passage of the con- that threshold requirement left opponents of the to a tactical dilemma whether to abstain from voters more than half of the College joined them, or to against the document, and hope more than a third of likewise.

opponents abstained, the constitution would have since a mere percent of undergraduates cast in favor. New balloting should require approval by of students, a simple requirement that seems only in an election that could restructure student government years to come.

officials in charge of running the election never of- the threshold requirement seems another flaw that helped divide the council's opposition. accounts of election officials who gave voters resituated accounts of the turnout to date--in is to away apathetic undergraduates to vote--also

of the very students responsible for devising in the first place--students who seem likely to on the council--hovered around the ballot-boxes count the votes. A new election run entirely by vested interests would go a long way toward about last week's shenanigans.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

of a 50 percent turnout clause inserted by the Faculty the "no" ballots cast last week by more than a voters actually secured the passage of the con- that threshold requirement left opponents of the to a tactical dilemma whether to abstain from voters more than half of the College joined them, or to against the document, and hope more than a third of likewise.

opponents abstained, the constitution would have since a mere percent of undergraduates cast in favor. New balloting should require approval by of students, a simple requirement that seems only in an election that could restructure student government years to come.

officials in charge of running the election never of- the threshold requirement seems another flaw that helped divide the council's opposition. accounts of election officials who gave voters resituated accounts of the turnout to date--in is to away apathetic undergraduates to vote--also

of the very students responsible for devising in the first place--students who seem likely to on the council--hovered around the ballot-boxes count the votes. A new election run entirely by vested interests would go a long way toward about last week's shenanigans.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

opponents abstained, the constitution would have since a mere percent of undergraduates cast in favor. New balloting should require approval by of students, a simple requirement that seems only in an election that could restructure student government years to come.

officials in charge of running the election never of- the threshold requirement seems another flaw that helped divide the council's opposition. accounts of election officials who gave voters resituated accounts of the turnout to date--in is to away apathetic undergraduates to vote--also

of the very students responsible for devising in the first place--students who seem likely to on the council--hovered around the ballot-boxes count the votes. A new election run entirely by vested interests would go a long way toward about last week's shenanigans.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

officials in charge of running the election never of- the threshold requirement seems another flaw that helped divide the council's opposition. accounts of election officials who gave voters resituated accounts of the turnout to date--in is to away apathetic undergraduates to vote--also

of the very students responsible for devising in the first place--students who seem likely to on the council--hovered around the ballot-boxes count the votes. A new election run entirely by vested interests would go a long way toward about last week's shenanigans.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

of the very students responsible for devising in the first place--students who seem likely to on the council--hovered around the ballot-boxes count the votes. A new election run entirely by vested interests would go a long way toward about last week's shenanigans.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

undergraduates, we initially overlooked the of the voting requirements, and expected the election in a more fair fashion. But that oversight should Undergraduate Council to become Harvard's official student government on the strength of its own electoral Students here deserve a chance to elect a legitimate government. Until that chance arises, we're willing to stick with what we've got.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags