From Beef to Bots? Harvard Professors Mired in Debate Over Spam Emails, Industry-Funded Research
Days Before Deadline, Environmentalist Overseer Campaign Harvard Forward On Track To Reach Nomination Goal
Swissbäkers Reopens Allston Location in Light of Recent Closures
Harvard Scientists Find Stress Makes Hair Turn Gray
The New Gen Ed Lottery System, Explained
Cambridge City Council passed an amendment that will impose a one year moratorium on cutting down trees in the city as part of an ongoing conservation effort at its weekly meeting Monday.
The ordinance bans granting permits for removing trees except in special circumstances, such as for trees classified as “dead” or “dangerous” by the city's arborist. Any violations of the proposed ban would be subject to municipal fines up to $5,000. The measure passed by a vote of 7-2, with Councillors Denise Simmons and Timothy J. Toomey, Jr., voting in opposition. The moratorium will officially go into effect March 11.
The City Council previously debated this amendment during a meeting in January, as well as at an Ordinance Committee meeting earlier this month. The committee voted to send the proposal back before the Council to be voted on.
In an interview Monday night following the vote, Vice Mayor Jan Devereux said she was pleased the amendment had passed, but she also said the moratorium is a “not the final product” and will act as a “stopgap” while the Council looks to enact more conservation policies.
“We are losing trees right, left, and center, it is alarming” she said during the council meeting on Monday. “This set of amendments is not going to stop all tree loss, but it sends a very strong signal.”
Several councillors offered their support for the amendment, but pointed to its flaws. Councillor Dennis J. Carlone voiced his concern over the vague definitions of which trees are eligible to be removed, specifically citing those considered “dangerous.”
Others, like Councillor Toomey, argued that the moratorium is unfairly “punitive” toward Cambridge residents.
“Government sometimes gets in the way,” Toomey said at the meeting. “I just think this amendment as proposed is just going to be very detrimental to the innocent property owner who is just going to be attacked for removing a tree.”
During the public comment portion of the meeting, over a dozen residents shared their opinions of the amendment proposal in front of the council. The majority argued in favor of its passage, but others, such as Denise A. Jillson, a Cambridge resident and the executive director of the Harvard Square Business Association, opposed it.
“There are issues that property owners will be confronted with, and you’re making it extremely difficult for us to take action when action needs to be taken,” she said.
Though many residents indicated their support for the moratorium, some had concerns over its limitations. Cambridge resident Judy Johnson argued that without further clarification, the measure would be insufficient to protect enough trees.
“Don't let trees be cut down because of mistakes in the process,” she said. “This is the beginning of our campaign to protect trees.”
Before voting, Mayor Marc C. McGovern and Councillor Alanna M. Mallon urged people to consider and act on issues with the same fervor as tree conservation.
“I am really looking for everyone to be as passionate about those really critical issues for our vulnerable population,” Mallon said.
Correction: Feb. 28, 2019
A previous version of this article misspelled Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.'s name.
— Staff writer Declan J. Knieriem can be reached at email@example.com. Follow him on Twitter at @DeclanKnieriem.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.