News
Progressive Labor Party Organizes Solidarity March With Harvard Yard Encampment
News
Encampment Protesters Briefly Raise 3 Palestinian Flags Over Harvard Yard
News
Mayor Wu Cancels Harvard Event After Affinity Groups Withdraw Over Emerson Encampment Police Response
News
Harvard Yard To Remain Indefinitely Closed Amid Encampment
News
HUPD Chief Says Harvard Yard Encampment is Peaceful, Defends Students’ Right to Protest
The popular debate about prayer in the public schools continues to be marked by "glaring misunderstandings" and "unreasoning emotions," Paul A. Freund, Carl M. Loeb University Professor, told the House Judiciary Committee Friday.
Freund characterized the recent court verdicts on school prayers as "sound and necessary reflections of the constitutional guarantees of the First Amendment." He said that the emotional atmosphere now surrounding the issue "is not a proper setting in which to reach a decision that would dislocate a basic provision of the Bill of Rights."
No Sectarian Services
Freund argued that the right of the majority to free exercise of religion does not extend to the holding of sectarian services in the school-room. He pointed out the impossibility of composing a suitable nonsectarian exercise, remarking that "one man's piety is another man's idolatry."
A school prayer at best could only be "so bland as to be meaningless" or "so sectarian as to be divisive," Freund stated. He emphasized that the most important effect of the Supreme Court's decision should be "a serious and basic inquiry into the moral component of public education."
Freund called for new attention to the curricular moral instruction that should replace sectarian religious exercises.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.