News

Progressive Labor Party Organizes Solidarity March With Harvard Yard Encampment

News

Encampment Protesters Briefly Raise 3 Palestinian Flags Over Harvard Yard

News

Mayor Wu Cancels Harvard Event After Affinity Groups Withdraw Over Emerson Encampment Police Response

News

Harvard Yard To Remain Indefinitely Closed Amid Encampment

News

HUPD Chief Says Harvard Yard Encampment is Peaceful, Defends Students’ Right to Protest

Staff's defense of Harvard's Nazi sympathies offensive

By Noah Oppenheim and Josh H. Simon

Today’s staff editorial (“Singling Out Harvard,” Nov. 18) attacking Professor Stephen Norwood was profoundly disappointing.

The Staff argues Harvard should not be singled out because its flirtations with Hitler were “not uncommon to the interwar period.” We’re not sure what is more appalling about this contention—the unconscionable attempt to deflect responsibility or the reasonings’ laughable intellectual laziness. “Everyone was doing it” did not work on the playground and it certainly isn’t effective when confronted with proof that this newspaper and this University openly espoused the twentieth century’s most pernicious ideas and coddled its greatest villains.

There are occasions when a simple apology and unadulterated remorse are appropriate. This was one such occasion.

NOAH D. OPPENHEIM ’00

JOSH H. SIMON ’00

Nov. 18, 2004

The writers were Editorial Chair and President of the Crimson, respectively.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags