News
Progressive Labor Party Organizes Solidarity March With Harvard Yard Encampment
News
Encampment Protesters Briefly Raise 3 Palestinian Flags Over Harvard Yard
News
Mayor Wu Cancels Harvard Event After Affinity Groups Withdraw Over Emerson Encampment Police Response
News
Harvard Yard To Remain Indefinitely Closed Amid Encampment
News
HUPD Chief Says Harvard Yard Encampment is Peaceful, Defends Students’ Right to Protest
Connecticut state police yesterday morning arrested approximately 250 black students who had occupied the library of the University of Connecticut (UConn) overnight in protest of the allegedly racist theories of William S. Laughlin and Benson E. Ginsburg, professors in UConn's department of Bio-Behavioral sciences.
Christine Smith, a graduate student in Anthropology at UConn, told an audience of 35 in William James Hall yesterday that a coalition of white students would reoccupy the library at midnight. They expect to be arrested this morning, she said.
Going Limp
Smith said that the demonstrators resisted attempts to dislodge them by going limp and forcing police to carry them individually from the building.
"UConn is a model for what will happen elsewhere," Anthony S. Kroch '67 lecturer in Anthropology at UConn, said last night.
"The only reason it hasn't happened at Harvard is that the anti-racists aren't well enough organized to provoke repression of this type," he said.
Kroch said the UConn administration earlier this year divided the department of Anthropology into two departments, Social Anthropology and Bio-cultural Anthropology, in order to increase funding for and stifle criticism of attempts to explain cultural traits in terms of genetic differences.
Jay O'Brien, UConn graduate student in Anthropology, called the theories of Laughlin and Ginsburg "more subtly racist and more plausibly scientific than those of Jensen, Shockley and Herrnstein." "They contend that different human 'abilities' are the expression of different genetic combinations, and that the differences between cultures are reflected by different combinations of gene frequencies," he said. O'Brien added that Laughlin and Ginsburg do not claim that the inherited genetic abilities of one culture are better than another, only "different."
Jay O'Brien, UConn graduate student in Anthropology, called the theories of Laughlin and Ginsburg "more subtly racist and more plausibly scientific than those of Jensen, Shockley and Herrnstein."
"They contend that different human 'abilities' are the expression of different genetic combinations, and that the differences between cultures are reflected by different combinations of gene frequencies," he said.
O'Brien added that Laughlin and Ginsburg do not claim that the inherited genetic abilities of one culture are better than another, only "different."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.